Facebook International Social Media Giant Co Strategic Audit Report

Facebook International Social Media Giant Co Strategic Audit Report

You are almost at the finish line; the last step in the completion of your strategic audit report is to put everything together.

You will compile your report with what you have already completed during each activity for the final strategic audit report. However, before you begin, ensure you go back and implement all of the instructor’s feedback, guidelines, and comments into each strategic audit assignment created in each module.

Part of the grade for this assignment includes your ability to implement feedback from the instructor properly. This should take several hours to do if it has not already been done. In most businesses, continual updates to a strategic audit report will be made based on an organizations input, feedback, and suggestions which is part of the overall processes.

Save your time - order a paper!

Get your paper written from scratch within the tight deadline. Our service is a reliable solution to all your troubles. Place an order on any task and we will take care of it. You won’t have to worry about the quality and deadlines

Order Paper Now

Complete Your Deliverable

Provided are the guidelines to complete your report:

  • Once you have updated each section based on your instructor’s feedback, compile all of the sections together as per the report outline provided within the Strategic Audit Report Guidelines.
  • Do not include anything extra such as a table of contents, abstract, summary, or other that is not listed as part of the report outline.
  • Ensure each section is identified correctly (title, numbers, and letters) as per the Strategic Audit Report Guidelines and that your sources are properly cited and referenced in current APA format.
  • Compile all pages of your document to submit to this assignment.

Review the Strategic Audit Report: Final Strategic Audit Report rubric for additional grading criteria.

Submit Your Results

Save your assignment using a naming convention that includes your first and last name and the activity number (or description). Do not add punctuation or special characters.

Your paper will automatically be evaluated through Turnitin when you submit your assignment in this activity. Turnitin is a service that checks your work for improper citation or potential plagiarism by comparing it against a database of web pages, student papers, and articles from academic books and publications. Ensure that your work is entirely your own and that you have not plagiarized any material!

Rubric

MGMT 436 9.3 – Strategic Audit Report: Final Strategic Audit Report

MGMT 436 9.3 – Strategic Audit Report: Final Strategic Audit Report

Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeUnderstands and Applies all Elements of the Strategic Audit Report
40.0 pts(Excellent – A)

All parts of the strategic audit are understood and completed correctly. Connection with class and study material goes well beyond the obvious connections among ideas; demonstrates insight and original thinking. All page length requirements met. All instructor feedback from the weekly strategic audit assignments applied to the final strategic audit report.

32.0 pts(Above-Average – B)

Some parts of the strategic audit are understood and completed correctly. Some irrelevant information on topic etc., but very little; treatment goes beyond obvious connections with class and study material. Most but not all page length requirements met. Most instructor feedback from the weekly strategic audit assignments applied to the final strategic audit report.

24.0 pts(Average – C)

Parts of the strategic audit are vague in places; some irrelevant or distracting information. Some but not all page length requirements met. Only some instructor feedback from the weekly strategic audit assignments applied to the final strategic audit report.

16.0 pts(Near-Failing – D)

Most of the strategic audit report is unclear and/or confusing. Treatment is very superficial; the strategic audit report may be well written but says nothing. Few or no page length requirements met. Very little if any instructor feedback from the weekly strategic audit assignments applied to the final strategic audit report.

0.0 pts(Failing – F)

Does not address the strategic audit purpose or follow the assignment guidelines. Treatment is very superficial and says very little. Few or no page length requirements met. None of the instructor feedback from the weekly strategic audit assignments applied to the final strategic audit report.

40.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeStrategy Choice and Justification
25.0 ptsExcellent (A)

An appropriate, reasonable strategy is selected and successfully developed. Content knowledge is used correctly.

20.0 ptsAbove-Average (B)

An appropriate, reasonable strategy is selected and moderately developed. Content knowledge used appropriately, with minor computation errors.

15.0 ptsAverage (C)

An appropriate, reasonable strategy is selected, but minimally developed. Uses content knowledge with conceptual errors.

10.0 ptsNear-Failing (D)

There is an attempt to solve the problem. Barely any strategy is applied that could lead to an answer. Rarely uses content knowledge.

0.0 ptsFailing (F)

There is no attempt to solve the problem. No strategy is applied that could lead to an answer. Uses no content knowledge.

25.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLinks to Course Readings and Additional Research
20.0 pts(Excellent – A)

Excellent research into the issues with clearly documented links to class (and/or outside) readings. Much more than the minimum required; effort to explore topic exceeds expectations; use of primary and secondary sources; all information meets quality criteria. Sources interspersed with writer’s own analysis or synthesis; quotes are less than 10% of paper; good use of summary and paraphrase; all sources are documented.

16.0 pts(Above-Average – B)

Good research and documented links to the material read. Slightly more than the minimum required; effort to ensure breadth and depth; possibly no primary sources; all information meets quality criteria. Sources interspersed with writer’s own work; quotes are less than 20% of paper; good use of summary and paraphrase; all sources are documented; minor errors (such as incorrect punctuation).

12.0 pts(Average – C)

Limited research and documented links to any readings. At least the minimum required; reasonable breadth and depth of exploration; 1-2 sources lack quality criteria (i.e., Wikipedia). 1-2 instances of stringing source references together with little of the writer’s own work; quotes are 25% or more of paper; 1-2 citations missing or with major errors (ex: authors missing or incorrect).

8.0 pts(Near-Failing – D)

Incomplete research and links to most readings. Less than the minimum required; or providing only surface coverage; most sources lack quality criteria. More than 2 instances of stringing source references; quotes are 40% or more of paper; OR paper includes few references to sources; 3-4 citations missing or with major errors.

0.0 pts(Failing – F)

Provided no references or support of analysis. Very few sources; no attempt to explore various points of view; all sources lack quality criteria total. No references to sources; OR there is evidence of plagiarism; 5 or more citations missing or with major errors.

20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization and Coherence
15.0 pts(Excellent – A)

Uses a logical structure appropriate to paper’s subject, purpose, audience, thesis, and disciplinary field. Sophisticated transitional sentences often develop one idea from the previous one or identify their logical relations. All sections clearly identified and presented clearly.

12.0 pts(Above-Average – B)

Shows a logical progression of ideas and uses fairly sophisticated transitional devices; e.g., may move from a least to a more important idea. Some logical links may be faulty, but each paragraph clearly relates to paper’s central idea. Most sections clearly identified and presented clearly.

9.0 pts(Average – C)

May list ideas or arrange them randomly rather than using any evident logical structure. May use transitions, but they are likely to be sequential (first, second, third) rather than logic-based. While each paragraph may relate to central idea, logic is not always clear. Only some sections clearly identified and presented clearly.

0.0 pts(Failing – F)

Absent of any kind of organization. Lacks paragraph topic sentence and transitions between paragraphs. Paragraphs do not relate to the paper’s thesis. Sections not clearly identified and presented clearly.

15.0 pts
Total Points: 100.0