We have discussed in class that fossils show evidence for evolution. This is shown with stunning clarity when the fossil record is completed as with the horse. However, there are instances where the fossil record is not complete which means there are gaps. Someone comes to you and states that because there are gaps in the record for species “A” this shows that evolution is not true. How do you argue against this statement? In other words how do you argue in favor of evolution when gaps are present? Or do these gaps invalidate evolution? Restrict your discussion to the fossil record only.
Be advised that this service is completely legal and does not infringe any college/university law. The paper received from our company may be used as a source for a deeper comprehension on the subject.
WEBSITE LIVE CHAT:
Any Given Deadline